Which ORM framework is best for .Net?

.Net Developers

There are a number of ORM framework which is best suited for .Net. A number of software development Companies are dealing with .Net Application Development. It depends on the developer’s way to select one which best suites his purpose.

Here are few of them:

1. Entity Framework
This is one of the best ORM for the .Net platform. It is built by Microsoft and has a vast number of features and great integration of new ones into the CLR languages with full support for Linq and even multiple database adapters. The OData capabilities of utilizing a Entity model so as to interest you and helpful to consume data in any other application without any requirement of coding system.

2. NHibernate
It has been around the longest, has the most users, and supports the most mapping scenarios. NHibernate with FluentNHibernate may also serve the best for the purpose because they are the most mature in the space. For mapping purpose, it can be done by a developer friendly Fluent API with Fluent NHibernate. EF4+ code first CTP 5 is slowly getting there, but they are not there yet.

3. BLToolKit
For a lightweight ORM, this can serve the best purpose. It is incredibly fast and since lightweight it gives better flexibility to for how you design your domain layer. Also they have great T4 templates for generating class files.

Laitkor.com is the best solution to all your software and developmental queries. For any support related to ORM framework and .Net, get the best assistance at Laitkor.com. The support team would be happy to assist you a better solution.

Share:

Read More

Do you think that Microsoft will someday bring the full DotNet development environment (Visual Studio, Windows Phone Emulator)to Mac/Linux like it happened with ASP.NET?

.net Development

For Mac and Linux, VS Code is the code editor. The developers are committed in making ASP.NET 5 work great on Mac and Linux, in production. It is not even that you will get more, but to be clear, there are many more available for your choice. The .Net Developers can be an expert for business site and development.

The full .Net development environment
1.    There is not much greater thing of achievement if they put full .Net development environment to another OSes. Some of their technologies are quiet platform specific, such as Winform. And some other Operating system already has the similar technology, such as GTK on Linux. It will take more effort but it will work for sure.

2.    Before the time that Microsoft will bring the full .Net development environment to Mac/ Linux, web based coding editor like your development environment, in the cloud will take over and you may not require Visual Studio at all. Though Visual Studio Online has few things, but there is good need for online VS Kind of .Net editor.

3.    It is always about financial strides for many companies if not all, to know how to get the market “going”. Recently, Microsoft released VS Code, an open-source and multi-platform scaffolding/ project management IDE with the only catch that you would have to have a project running already and it would take it up from there.

4.    First you need to re-architecture it and create better API (simpler and without COMs) at times you are not required to port Visual Studio one-to-one on Linux and Mac. It is functionally very good but API is terrible. VS is a great tool, but too heavy weight sometimes.

For any other queries related to .Net development, you can consult our consulting team at Laitkor helpdesk.

Share:

Read More

What is the best way to set up a Ruby on Rails development environment on Ubuntu?

Ruby On Rails Development

There are number of possible ways to set up a Ruby on Rails development environment on Ubuntu, but you must wisely select the best one for your work requirement. Take the easy way out and install a pre-configured environment from Bitnami. With our Ruby on Rails (RoR) development services we provide the best way to set up a Ruby on Rails development environment and security related to it.

The best way to set up a Ruby on Rails development environment
1.    Bitnami have native installers, VMware virtual appliances or they will host it for you in the cloud if you prefer. The first two are completely free.

2.    Many developers prefer Vagrant to set up any new Rails environment going forward. It consists of the following steps:

•    Step 1: Install VirtualBox
•    Step 2: Install any version of Ruby (selectively the best with RVM)
•    Step 3: Gem install Vagrant.

Then you can use a pre-configured box such as EY’s. Instead, you can provision your own VirtualBox by creating a Chef recipe and use that for future development environments as well. Between EY, 37 signals, and the opscode cookbooks you should be able to find everything that you need.

3.    It is ironic how the “web framework that is optimized for programmer’s happiness and sustainable productivity” isn’t optimized for installations. Everything starts with an installation. The fastest implies to use of Window machine and install RailInstaller. The Bitnami machine use Ubuntu 10.10 and has two options:

•    RubyStack 2.2-2 (Ruby 1.8.7, Rails 2.3.11)
•    RubyStack 2.3-0 dev (Ruby 1.9.2, Rails 3)

4.    Once you perform what was asked at the first time you are running Bitnami machine you will enter in the command mode, no graphical interface to run. You can also give it a try to Virtual machine. That works fairly well.

5.    You can even start learning and writing codes using some tutorials instead of figuring a long time just about the installations. That is not a good way to get more adopters in ROR’s camp, especially those who would want to switch from Windows camp.

You can consider the above possible ways that are better to follow to set up a Ruby on Rails development environment. For any other queries related to ROR development and security, you can contact us at our company’s website Laitkor.com. our expert team panel will assist all your queries.

Share:

Read More

Which is the best PHP framework in 2014….Laravel?

Laravel Framework

Laravel is an open source web application framework for PHP, crafted for the development of model–view–controller web applications. Its free and its source code is hosted on GitHub.

Ever since its release in June 2011, it has continuously gained popularity and tops the list among all PHP frameworks may it be Phalcon, Symfony2, CodeIgniter and others.

Coming back to my question, if Laravel is the best PHP framework for 2014 then the answer is definitely YES. Below are the features which make it stand out in comparison to others.

Inherent Database Version control
Built-in unit testing and simple readable impressive syntax
Bigger community catering to a pool of programming geeks and developers
Bears application logic ready to be incorporated in any web app
Restful routes
Most elegant Blade templating engine
Database agnostic
Easy learning
Composer
Not to forget, these are just a glimpse of the most impressive and important Laravel features. It offers a lot of packages which makes development quiet easier when we compare it with other php frameworks. Having tremendous support, it never compromises on speed and always rendered in minimum time. Laravel is capable of making your day in development. Innovation accompanied with adaptability to modern development requirements following a good architecture design is what defines well Laravel.

Worth trying once so give it a chance!

It will reignite your passion for code, reinforce your understanding of MVC and is fun to develop. Also it wont let you leave PHP ?

Best framework in PHP to turn idea into reality quickly.

Share:

Read More

Switching a 10 year old web app’s codebase?

Web App Development

Are you planning to switch a 10 year old web application’s code base from ColdFusion to a more known and popular PHP, Python or Ruby language? Explore the benefits and downsides before making a leap.

If you have a working app for past 10-15 years say for example a hosted site builder application that is continuously serving hundreds of paying customer every month…then switching your app’s code base to a more recent one may be a costly and risky affair.

Lets find out why???

Rewriting a working application for no evident functional benefit mostly turns out to be both costly and risky. The whole development cost may pile upon to something you might not have imagined and that too up front. Do not forget that after the initial software rewriting you are also bound to pay for the ongoing operations and its due maintenance. In a way rewriting an app is just like developing it altogether for a second time with double the cost that is definitely not going to pay itself.

So, if your app is successful in the market and your team is managing it well and ColdFusion is also supporting all app features, then there is truly no need to rewrite the app.

You might think…

Your app will become outdated as the crowd is trending towards newer technologies. Remind yourself that your customers don’t actually care about the technology your application is built in, they are only concerned that the application should keep running.
If your application code has become disorganized, then consider refactoring the code. This can be done without any interruption to the app working.
Lets take an analogy…

If you build a snack factory, it costs a lot upfront along with its machinery and just a little for the ongoing maintenance. But one day you notice that other factories which are being built are using new architecture techniques. So should you rebuild your existing factory in order to take advantage of the new  technologies being introduced and then again put the same machinery for the manufacturing work? Or should you consider developing a new factory from scratch leaving the old factory to make revenue for you as it stands and using its profit in your new venture for a different target customer base

Here are some rock solid reasons for switching your code base…

You need a functionality for your app which is not supported by your current technology or may be it does but is very expensive or inefficient than offered by other technologies.
You take support from a vendor and he is discontinuing support. (Just FYI…ColdFusion is owned by Adobe and they still provide good support services)
Your old technology development team is moving and its getting tough to find a replacement for them. Analyse if it is more affordable to hire a developer and train him in the old technology or to rewrite the application.

Share:

Read More

Which PHP framework is mature enough to use in production environment: Laravel or Fuel PHP or any other?

Laravel Framework

When it comes to finalizing PHP framework for a production environment, developers find themselves bewildered with options, Lavel and Fuel PHP topping the list of best qualifiers. Unless one has tried hands at both at varied circumstances, it is even more difficult to say which amongst the two is more mature for usage in production environment. For long term projects of firms like advertising agencies, it is essential that they hit upon the right framework and not a hype one as it should be consistent and free from hindrances that come up from time to time. And you cannot go on to a change which would leave things messed up so it is essential to make the right choice in the very beginning.

We would in such circumstances suggest Laravel without doubt. Though new to the line of frameworks, Laravel has managed to grab attention and has received commendable feedbacks for being competent and more reliable than Fuel PHP or CodeIgniter. It comprises all advantages of callbacks, IoC and event driven behavior in the best possible way. Unit Tests are accommodated to perfection, the Migrations are flawless and their Schema class is excellent as well. You don’t have to deal with loads of procedural codes.

While Fuel PHP is a simple, flexible community driven framework, Laravel is for Web Artisans. For those looking for a change from the traditional, Laravel provides excellent platform for trial with lesser risks that usually come with newer frameworks.

While Fuel PHP has traditional has no compiler and library file size is 4 MB, Laravel has a compiler and library file size is 17 MB. Laravel also has the advantage of X Update support which Fuel PHP lacks. Laravel is easy to adapt to, even if you are a new to it, you can grab it in a few weeks and be at ease working with it soon.

While Fuel PHP is a simple, flexible community driven framework, Laravel is for Web Artisans. For those looking for a change from the traditional, Laravel provides excellent platform for trial with lesser risks that usually come with newer frameworks.

Most developers who have been using CodeIgniter for years because of its ease with coding and deploying are switching to Laravel because it is more advanced and eventually comprises everything within a single framework. One of the reasons why large scale projects that need running for years should use Laravel is its ease and free flowing, no blockage on the way quality. It is adaptable hence one can use it to perfection starting from the simplest of projects to the most complicated ones.

What many developers who have tried hands at Laravel would commend it for is its eloquence. It makes user easy to interact with the database. One can define relationships easier than never before, eager loading is a doddle, has simple accessors/mutators and pagination quite simple. As I mentioned earlier it is meant for Artisan for commands and CRON jobs is so much nicer than standard PHP Web Development scripts. One can deploy soft deleting easily through traits. Route groups/filters makes route creation easier like none else specifically for API development.

While Laravel is the new award grabber for many, some would still prefer Fuel PHP, either because they have years of experience with this framework and find an ease working with them or they are afraid to take risks of trying something outside of their expertise zone. I would suggest that they should try Laravel without any worries of facing hadship learning something that is alien to them. It would be long when they would stick to Laravel only to never stop using it ever, especially in production environment.

Share:

Read More

Best Programming Language To Build A SaaS App

Web App Development

Ask for advises on the best programming language to build A SaaS App and all you would get in return are some vague high handed advises like… it won’t really matter which language you write the application in or just go for whichever you are comfortable working with or even more confusing ones like… try one, if you don’t like it you can rewrite in the another language. But the fact remains that you are not looking for experimentation with your hard work. You want straight simple answer. We have some for you.

Here are things you should ensure before jumping in for a particular programming language:
1. You should be well acquainted with the language and the pros and cons of choosing the same.
2. You team and developer working in the project should be able to code in that language.
3. The expenses of maintaining the same.
4. You should have apt testing tools for that language.
5. Compatibility and reliability of platforms that would run your app.

While we don’t claim that these are the only programming languages that are worthy of being included in the list, we can say that some of the most successful companies trust them. Well, you asked for the best, we give you just that.

Java
One of the most popular programming language, taught worldwide in some of the most reputed universities and institutes, is ideal for your SAAS apps for you can easily find developers using this language. If you have future plans of creating android app, this is the ideal one for you. Expenses and memory needed are both higher with this language.

PHP
The oldest is still the best. Various frameworks and libraries come handy in using this language when you are building SAAS app. Even a non developer can easily code it and that often comes as an added advantage. The formats are quite similar to other languages and you can easily find qualified developers.

Ruby
This is a common and fast option for you only if you are comfortable with the speed with which things will move.

Node.js
Once you get comfortable using this language, it can become your favorite for its ease, speed and scalability. Chrome’s JavaScript makes it free of errors and effective for cross platform apps. You can write the front end code and back end code in the same language which can be an advantage in many a ways.

Python
Look at it from data analysis point of view and there is no reason why you shouldn’t start liking it already. With Django framework, one of the most powerful in its class, the design is completely pragmatic.

Whitescape, Scala, Clojure and many more are also effective in one way or the other. The best practice while choosing programming language for your SAAS app is to understand which of them you and your developer know well and will be comfortable working with them.

Share:

Read More

Node.js versus Python, Development Benefits

Node.js Development Services

According to consideration with regard to the possibilities, it could be said that there are versatile reasons due to which development in Node.js differ from that of Python Development. Though it is similar to developing in other languages, a lot can be made of Node’s asynchronous nature and at the same time you can perform event-driven apps in Python.

It is not so difficult to deal with, rather simpler to undertake. If you are a great developer and you love JavaScript programming, then no doubt you could easily trace the benefits of Node that it’s purely subjective.

Yet most of the programmers are expertise at using different programming languages for different tasks. On the other hand if we consider it programmatically, it is also followed by some disadvantages as well. Being a newer language and less specialized, more bugs, less documentation, and missing pieces, can be expected here. No doubt all these things are being improved with the passage of time to the modern and technological innovative era and there is an active community around Node. At the same time you can also find many active community around Python, Django, Twisted, etc. as well.

You could be able to use a technology that is considered very hip now-a-days by exchanging those bugs and can get credibility with various kinds of people. It is just similar to Rails circa 2006-2007.

Keeping in mind, the relevance of such kind of stuffs could promote you to a broader advantages. You can also opt for Python (Tornado) as you would be able to start and operate it easily, having a good support.

Node.js is more beneficiary other than different development environment, including Python. Here Node is found more important. Let us relate this comparison between development in Node.js and python as question of fact in points:

1.    Node.js is constructed to handle asynchronous I/O from the very ground up, where as other developing environments are followed by a weakness to have async. Node is the very first opportunity where it is really all pervading. In all other environment you would find only limited pieces available in async. Thus, it became hard to write non-async code in Node. It’s really a good combination to a lot of common web and network development problems.

2.    Another point to be kept in view is that it’s just a JavaScript. Most of the time confusion is aroused for switches between Python on the backend and JavaScript on the front-end. You may be wasting your most of the time in making syntax errors- semicolons in Python, missing braces in JavaScript, etc. Thus switching couldn’t be a relevant solution rather you are wasting brain cycles swapping in and out your language knowledge. Staying in a single language gives you faster and better performance.

3.    Though it’s new, it has the benefit of being able to learn from previous mistakes regarding languages and environments. Ultimately, Node can correct those mistakes without the backward-compatibility concerns. Finally to say, Node looked very polished and modern and along with that it didn’t have time to accumulate the cruft which is available in other languages and environments.

4.    You would take time to learn Node completely. It will surely make you a perfect and better developer, whatever you end up using. It’s a cool software and great tools which should be available in your toolbox.

To conclude, both the software developers are independent of each other. Like if you are already using Python for some part of your system, you don’t need to load your team with other languages. It re-doubles the maintenance job.

You can use both the languages for both clients and servers and Yes Laitkor team is always here.

Share:

Read More

Will ASP.Net MVC development model overtake ASP.net webforms development model?

asp.net Development

Newer development models overtaking the old traditional ones that haven’t been much appreciated due to lack of upgrades is not an alien concept in the programming world. Developers are often down to apprehensions on whether the programming language they are currently investing their efforts in to learn and utilize might one fine day die when a new one hits market. Asp.net Webforms was already under the threat of being ruled out when Microsoft decided to turn the ball back into its court by bringing in MVC and investing all its efforts in making it competent and efficient for developers. Some saw a new beginning for asp.net development when MVC proved its efficacy at being preferred by many. Now those that have been using Webforms are under pressure of their model becoming outdated.

Changes and that too advanced and better ones are always needed and that’s what MVC brought along. Clean mark-ups, better control, and easy hand written codes in place of server generated ones which do not well understand the needs of client side technologies are some of the advantages of MVC over Webforms. New age Java script frameworks is an added advantage of course. When one can avail better equipped packages that would be easier and more efficient for ones application, there is no genuine reason to prefer the older one with lacking features. This could be one reason of the many that contributes to the overtaking of the new model over the older one.

MVC offers higher testability and less obfuscation of inner working which is mostly preferred by engineers worldwide. As some fellow developers would agree that Webform is nothing but a hack design intended to lore WinForm developers to web. However, given that one could always flip and convert Webforms sites to use MVC framework hence utilizing its benefits along with keeping up the efforts of the traditional ones, it is more likely that Webforms will not be dead anytime sooner.

With MVC, developers and designers can always work together without messing into each other’s code. You get more options to work with raw HTML and the codes look cleaner compared to auto generated ones with Webforms. However, there are some still who prefer the work to be done quickly and with lesser efforts with automated codes. They would prefer Webform any day over MVC which requires good understanding of the concepts related into the procedures but they are easily done with examples and support whenever required.

Those preferring MVC can always use Webform controls by selecting ASPX engine on the same project. Webforms will continue being used and as MVC has always clarified from time to time, it is never intended to replace Webforms. Glancing at the larger picture of asp.net, we do know that each of the models have its own advantages which cannot be replaced or copied. Some are still and will continue to be scared of trying the new models and they will prefer Webforms as long as they are clear on their requisites being met.

Share:

Read More

What is better choice for a startup company, PHP or Python?

Web App Development

When it comes to the problem of trade-off for startup company between PHP or Python, Python is found faster to develop as it prevents you from making a series of errors. Both choices are completely reasonable for a web application of low to moderate complexity. Still the progress depends entirely on viewpoint of one’s capability levels of dealing with the works as the overall deal site is relatively easier either way.

According to possibility, use of API’s might tilt your decision depending on the provider tool-kit/code samples. You should not worry about scalability at this stage. If you had a million uniques, you can afford to substitute two or three servers. It really doesn’t take that much to scale to that levels these days.

Only thing you will have to look after is to think about Master-Slave databases, model segregation etc. while Django was made for taking care of these stuffs transparently. You don’t need to bother about GAE unless you also want to learn another data storage method on top of your language. You should be careful to deploy anything on GAE until you have profiled your application and will have a clear prescribed estimate on the hosting costs, ideally as a function of use.

Related to the element “hosting cost”, a cheap webhost for initial development is <10/mth. For the process of launching, upgrade to a simple 50-80/mth onwards. For a startup company, PHP is quite cheaper. All amounts are far less than the cost of your time to bother about the cost structures. But after a certain period you will find it get more expensive to host and to maintain PHP Applications Development Services because you need to maintain more CPU for the same system written in PHP than from one written in Python.

To conclude, PHP developers are cheaper and are easier to trace. With the procedure of coding from the scratch, there lies the higher chance of making hardly reversible mistakes and in the tenure of long run you will hire developers and sysadmins who are already familiar with different frameworks. Thus, to know a new code base would lead to much more time taking procedure.

Share:

Read More