What is the best Node.js template engine?

Node.js Developers

Talking about best Node.js template engine, there are number of template engine available to use by Node.js developers. Some are discussed most concisely with regard to its developments and qualities with view to cover most of their sections.

All the templates engine available are followed by certain pros and cons, and which should more effective should to be considered according to its suitability and availability of satisfying power to achieve all those basic functions efficiently which are performed at the due course. Let’s start the discussion regarding several template engines for Node.js. The most popular and well known template engine is Jade that is similar to Html which uses white space.

To utilize the same server side templates on the front-end, jade-browser library is available. It is the reason due to which it is used at Storify. Complementing the template benchmark, jade is 2x slower than Handlebars, EJS, Underscore, etc. The functioning of ECT seemed to be relative faster.

Usually, the whitespace-strict languages, such as Python, are unfavorable as it is inclined more towards Handlebars/Moustache which seemed to be a default choice for reactive templates with web-sockets, which are Derby, Meteor frameworks etc. though it is not specific, Moustache.js is one of the simplest and versatile template engines. Still it is not so admirable and effective engine as it doesn’t allow you to run if/else and other logics in the templates.

Thus, templates remain completely as templates are driven totally be the JSON data provider. If and for loop based on the JSON data is the only implicit reason to prefer it. Otherwise there are no valid reasons available for convenience. It may also depend on the behavior that how much logic you want to put in your templates. Here we are left with no other relevant option other than to prefer logic-less templates (a Moustache engine), so Hogan is the weapon of choice. Yet we couldn’t find a good wrapper to use Hogan with Express and still get partial and layout support.

Here you can identify the comparative reason to move from Jade to Moustache. Though Jade is elegant in making a template markup, it is really a thing of beauty which is more attractive. On the other hand, Moustache is “lower-level”. It’s is really easy to just whip together the bits of html with variables interspersed, rendered with a context and to get output. Most people prefer to switch to Moustache from Jade basically because it is found faster and conceptually simple to be used it as a client-side.

You should not maintain two solutions on the server and client. Therefore it seemed to be good to shift rightward from Jade to Moustache which could be proved later to be active move. You may also like Jade syntax, but it could be little too invasive and force developers to learn something radically different from HTML.

Another fastest and passionate template engine is Dot.js.

At the same time you should also keep in mind that the fastest doesn’t always means the best, but look for the one with which you and your team may be comfortable to use. You can also use Swig on various assignments which could be seen more attractive. It is of great pleasure to work with it and the 2x version is very easy to expand. It also works both on server and client. Or you should rather stick to something which seemed to be the mainstream of the project and should opt for the one with which you are more comfortable. The mainstreams could be recognized in the ways such that the following engine is attached to its features. Like Jade is great for template aspects.

On the other hand, Coffee Kup favorable for Coffee-Script programmers. In this way you can select your template engines by combination of functions of various engines and by eliminating the less preferred one.

Share: