Most EDA tools accessible for programmers are compute intensive and retention intensive. Python Development Company treasures the idea great to use Python as a vanilla language to develop EDA tools. Chips have become more complex and transistor counts have increased exponentially with every cohort. This exponential evolution in intricacy and size has led to a conforming growth in EDA tool data-base sizes as well as computes power compulsory to processes these data-bases.
High-Performing EDA Tools in Python
1. Most of the EDA tools are compute intensive as well as memory intensive; challenging high performance from a compute as well as competence standpoint. EDA Tools has to handle input data sets that contained signal level commotion over 100’s of millions of clock cycles and convey results in seconds. It has to scrutinize this signal level activity and recognize outlines and classify them. This practice is quite compute intensive and has to be achieved over large input data sets.
2. Python is a high-productivity language. By some approximations, writing the same logic takes 1/6th the number of lines when equated to C. This is great for tool development as it permits developers to add functionality at a break-neck pace. It also allows developers to try different slants and select the one that works best.
3. On the other hand, Python does not have a status for high-performance is the forfeit developers have to recompense for the productivity gains a high-level language like Python offers. Untimely optimization is the root of all sinful, and so initially the tool developers focused more on functional accuracy and not so much on enactment. As the tool encountered real life data sets, performance bottlenecks became observable. Numerous iterations of presentation optimizations followed.
4. Initial performance optimizations were done with feedback from a performance profiler. The profiler recognized where the program was spending a lot of execution time. This helped to identify performance issues such as:
 |
| Python Development - Laitkor |
High-Performing EDA Tools in Python
1. Most of the EDA tools are compute intensive as well as memory intensive; challenging high performance from a compute as well as competence standpoint. EDA Tools has to handle input data sets that contained signal level commotion over 100’s of millions of clock cycles and convey results in seconds. It has to scrutinize this signal level activity and recognize outlines and classify them. This practice is quite compute intensive and has to be achieved over large input data sets.
2. Python is a high-productivity language. By some approximations, writing the same logic takes 1/6th the number of lines when equated to C. This is great for tool development as it permits developers to add functionality at a break-neck pace. It also allows developers to try different slants and select the one that works best.
3. On the other hand, Python does not have a status for high-performance is the forfeit developers have to recompense for the productivity gains a high-level language like Python offers. Untimely optimization is the root of all sinful, and so initially the tool developers focused more on functional accuracy and not so much on enactment. As the tool encountered real life data sets, performance bottlenecks became observable. Numerous iterations of presentation optimizations followed.
4. Initial performance optimizations were done with feedback from a performance profiler. The profiler recognized where the program was spending a lot of execution time. This helped to identify performance issues such as:
- Sub optimally written code
- Bad data-structures choice
- Better algorithm choices
- Memory VS Compute tradeoffs
- 5. With the above optimizations identified and done in the Python Code, you can be able to get recital improvements of 50-70%.
- During the process, some very grave routines may not be improved any further. By writing small parts of the program in C, you can profit from both, the high performance of C and the high-productivity of Python.
- 6. For the next level of programming again, you have to look at parallelizing the tool’s core engine. This is where Python really shined. To parallelize the tool, you have to make some serious architectural changes. Using Python’s multi-processing library you could parallelize with ease. What would have taken 6 to 8 months in C may take less than 2 months and give another 20 to 50 % performance upgrading that depends on data input set.
- 7. The PDA tool decodes high-level protocol packets and dealings from signal level information. It allows users to visualize system and unit activities in terms of lists of packets or state machines. The tool also checks for protocol mistakes and helps by providing several repair analysis and mechanization features.
- Python’s rich high-level programming features and its C extensions competences allow you to achieve the performance objectives by using practices such as: Code or memory profiling, implementing small, performance critical kernel in C and parallelizing the core engine. Yes, it is possible to develop high-performance tools in Python.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.